Monday, April 6, 2009
the Death penalty
SO ITS TIME FOR ANOTHER PAPER...HMMM...SOUNDS LIKE FUN...NOT!!! I THINK THIS ONE IS MORE LIKE GIVE YOUR OPINION AND DO RESEARCH TO BACK IT UP. MAYBE NOT. I ALWAYS TEND TO GET CONFUSED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. AS OF RIGHT NOW IM GOING TO WRITE ABOUT THE DEATH PENALTY AND CORETTA SCOTT KING'S ESSAY. THE POINT IM GOING TO TRY AND ARGUE IS THAT THE DEATH PENALTY REFLECTS THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE WRONG DOER IS BEYOND REHABILITATION. I GUESS IT REALLY DEPENDS ON WHAT I CAN FIND MORE RESEARCH ON. IF THATS NOT WHA I WILL ARGUE THAN IT WILL BE THE FACT THE EVIL IS NOT REDEEMED BY EVIL. I AM AGAINST THE DEATH PENALY IN SO MANY WAYS FOR SO MANY REASONS SO I THOUGHT SOEMTHING I FELT SO STRONGLY ABOUT WOULD BE SO EASY TO WRITE ABOUT. IM PRETTY SURE HOW I FELT WAS EXPRESSED IN CLASS SO I DONT HAVE TO BLOG ABOUT BUT I KNOW FOR A FACT IT WILL DEFIANTLY BE EXPRESSED IN MY PAPER. I JUST REALIZED HOW MUCH I TALK AND EXPRESS MYSELF IN CLASS...MAYBE TOO MUCH. i GUESS IM JUST USED TO THAT KINF OF CLASSROOM VIBE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
First, I really appreciate that you express yourself in class. I wish some of your classmates would join you.
ReplyDeleteI think you've got the idea of this essay. Make sure that you do pick one angle moving forward, i.e. the rehabilitation angle or the "two wrongs" angle. Also, this paper doesn't require outside research, but it might make your argument better/easier to construct.